Fraud is a crime                                                              Marriage is not an immigration deal
  FraudMarriage.com

 

Complaint Forms                                     Home    About Us    Contact Us                   Discussion Forum          Marriage Fraud - USA

      

 

 

  Petition

  Victims

  Exhibitions

  Articles

  Immigration Links

  Related Links

  Feedback

  Volunteers

  NRI Victims

 

 

  Copyright @ 2006

  Privacy Policy

 

  fraudmarriage.com

 

The Hon. Roy Cullen, P.C., M.P.  Etobicoke North

Happily never after


Increasing instances of marriage fraud involving
Indo-Canadians have authorities concerned

by Ajit Jain
 

Two cases of alleged marriage frauds formthe basis for a letter from a Canadian politi-cian to Immigration Minister Monte Solberg, suggesting that all marriages between a Canadian and a foreigner should be subject to a certain period of probation.

 

 

Liberal Member of Parliament Roy Cullen further suggests that only after the lapse of the probation period, and if the couple continues in a marital relationship, should permanent visas be given to the spouse.

Cullen told India Abroad many Indo-
Canadians "in my riding have expressed
concerns over the abuse that is taking
place."

There are 12,500 Indo-Canadians in Cullen's riding of Etobicoke North (Ontario), and about 29,000 South Asians out of a total population of 117,000. "I closely inter-act with a number of very respectable Indo-Canadians, and they are telling me it is becoming like an epidemic and it is being seriously abused," Cullen said. " And so they have suggested that the Immigration Act be amended to issue spousal visa on probation of say 3-5 years, and if they are still married at the cut off date, then they can get a permanent visa."

Cullen said the Indo-Canadians in his riding have even suggested that if the marriage has broken up within that time frame, "the spouse should be deported to his/her homeland, but I don't support that because first of al, if you are in an abusive relationship, even if it is not a physically abusive relationship, why must a man or a woman remain in such a relationship?

"I have, therefore, suggested that if, say
after 3 years, they are still living together,
there would be an opportunity for hus-
band/wife to come before a specially constituted panel set up by the Citizenship Immigration Canada or Immigration Refugee Board where they would hear cases of spousal abuse. The panel could make a judgement, report to the police or whatever, and say where there's a genuine attempt to make the marriage work andthen make a determination." Cullen said he has personally spoken with Immigration Minister Solberg about the
abuses.

The Globe and Mail in its July 29 issue
front-paged a story detailing two cases,
both from Gujarat, of such alleged mar-
riages of convenience. One case reportedly involves Indo-Canadian Mehul Parikh, 27, a factory worker in Toronto, with Pinal Shah, 21, from Baroda, which was arranged through an agency in July, 2002.

The other involves a marriage between
Bhavita Shah, an Indo-Canadian with Sub Shah, a textile engineer from Baroda; the couple has one son, born last year. In court documents, Parikh alleges he is a victim of marriage fraud. He reportedly says that when he met his wife for the first time in Baroda, he noticed right away that she walked with a pronounced limp, and that she is now on a waiting list for hip replacement surgery.

Parikh in his court filing claims he found
papers in his wife's files from the Baroda
Homeopathic Medical Hospital, which said she has a disease called avascular necrosis in her leg, for which she had been taking homeopathic medicine. This disease causes bone tissue to die, and bones to collapse.

The couple has separated; both of them
have filed their versions in court, with
Parikh claiming he was a victim of fraud
and now he is financially ruined and can-
not work, as he is on anti-depressant
medication.

Another story concerns Bhavita Shah, a
constituent of Roy Cullen. Shah told India Abroad In she has asked the court to deport Sub Shah to India as "it was a marriage of convenience, which I couldn't understand when we got married in India in January 2004."

She was unwilling go into details about
her filing in court. She said however that
they had a baby last year, which she took to Gujarat.

She says her husband told her to go ahead and he would join her later, but
"instead of coming to India, he removed all stuff from the apartment, took out all the money from the bank, because I jrusted him and we had a joint bank account and disappeared and filed for a divorce," she alleges, adding that the grounds being cited for divorce is mental crue)ty . She says that on "the day we got married, the marriage registry office was closed and so he took my signatures on the form -but I later discovered he never registered our marriage. The office has given me in writing that they can't find any such marriage that has been registered with them."

She alleged that her husband wanted her to abort their child, and subjected her to "all kinds of pressure, but I didn't agree with him because of which he was not very happy."

The court has given Sub Shah the right to
see and feed his baby once in two weeks; for two hours at a time. "He has otherwise restraining orders not to come closer to me or the baby," Bhavita claimed.

Senior immigration lawyer Mendel Green
agrees cases of marriage of convenience are multiplying, and most of those cases
involve South Asians. "I am dealing with
hundreds of South Asians now. I see an
increase in the fraud in family class."

MP Cullen said frauds exist within other
communities as well, but in his riding he
has, only been hearing of such cases from amongst Indo-Canadians.

Marina Wilson, a spokeswoman of the
immigration department, is quoted in a
Canadian national daily as suggesting
Canadians must take responsibility when
marrying abroad, to ensure their spouses'
intentions are sincere. 'There are always
people who try to outsmart the system.'
Under the existing rules, foreign spouses
get permanent residency as soon as they
land in Canada.

The report says about 15 per cent of the 60,000 Canadians who marry overseas and file international spousal sponsorships have their applications rejected. In the case of India, the rejection rate is stated to be as high as 23 per cent